Martin <rc6encrypted@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> The smallest disk of the 122 is 500GB. Is it possible to have btrfs
> see each disk as only e.g. 10GB? That way I can corrupt and resilver
> more disks over a month.
Well, at least you can easily partition the devices for that to happen.
However, I would also suggest that would it be more useful use of the
resource to run many arrays in parallel? Ie. one 6-device raid6, one
20-device raid6, and then perhaps use the rest of the devices for a very
large btrfs filesystem? Or if you have been using partitioning the large
btrfs volume can also be composed of all the 122 devices; in fact you
could even run multiple 122-device raid6s and use different kind of
testing on each. For performance testing you might only excert one of
the file systems at a time, though.
--
_____________________________________________________________________
/ __// /__ ____ __ http://www.modeemi.fi/~flux/\ \
/ /_ / // // /\ \/ / \ /
/_/ /_/ \___/ /_/\_\@modeemi.fi \/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
