So we can read a btree block via readahead or intentional read,
and we can end up with a memory leak when something happens as
follows,
1) readahead starts to read block A but does not wait for read
completion,
2) btree_readpage_end_io_hook finds that block A is corrupted,
and it needs to clear all block A's pages' uptodate bit.
3) meanwhile an intentional read kicks in and checks block A's
pages' uptodate to decide which page needs to be read.
4) when some pages have the uptodate bit during 3)'s check so
3) doesn't count them for eb->io_pages, but they are later
cleared by 2) so we has to readpage on the page, we get
the wrong eb->io_pages which results in a memory leak of
this block.
This fixes the problem by firstly getting all pages's locking and
then checking pages' uptodate bit.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index bd29b9b..a77050e 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -5215,11 +5215,20 @@ int read_extent_buffer_pages(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
lock_page(page);
}
locked_pages++;
+ }
+ /*
+ * We need to firstly lock all pages to make sure that
+ * the uptodate bit of our pages won't be affected by
+ * clear_extent_buffer_uptodate().
+ */
+ for (i = start_i; i < num_pages; i++) {
+ page = eb->pages[i];
if (!PageUptodate(page)) {
num_reads++;
all_uptodate = 0;
}
}
+
if (all_uptodate) {
if (start_i == 0)
set_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_UPTODATE, &eb->bflags);
--
2.5.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
