Re: Send-recieve performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 20.07.2016 11:15 Libor Klepáč wrote:
> Hello,
> we use backuppc to backup our hosting machines.
>
> I have recently migrated it to btrfs, so we can use send-recieve for offsite backups of our backups.
>
> I have several btrfs volumes, each hosts nspawn container, which runs in /system subvolume and has backuppc data in /backuppc subvolume
> .
> I use btrbk to do snapshots and transfer.
> Local side is set to keep 5 daily snapshots, remote side to hold some history. (not much yet, i'm using it this way for few weeks).
>
> If you know backuppc behaviour: for every backup (even incremental), it creates full directory tree of each backed up machine even if it has no modified files and places one small file in each, which holds some info for backuppc. 
> So after few days i ran into ENOSPACE on one volume, because my metadata grow, because of inlineing.
> I switched from mdata=DUP to mdata=single (now I see it's possible to change inline file size, right?).
I am biased, but UrBackup works like BackupPC, except it has a client,
and like btrbk puts every backup into a separate btrfs sub-volume with
snapshotting reducing metadata workload. Then you could create read-only
snapshots from the UrBackup sub-volumes and use e.g. buttersink to copy
those to another btrfs.

So maybe try that?

Regards,
Martin

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux