On Thursday, July 14, 2016 07:47:04 PM Chris Mason wrote: > On 07/14/2016 07:31 PM, Omar Sandoval wrote: > > From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxx> > > > > So it turns out that the free space tree bitmap handling has always been > > broken on big-endian systems. Totally my bad. > > > > Patch 1 fixes this. Technically, it's a disk format change for > > big-endian systems, but it never could have worked before, so I won't go > > through the trouble of any incompat bits. If you've somehow been using > > space_cache=v2 on a big-endian system (I doubt anyone is), you're going > > to want to mount with nospace_cache to clear it and wait for this to go > > in. > > > > Patch 2 fixes a similar error in the sanity tests (it's the same as the > > v2 I posted here [1]) and patch 3 expands the sanity tests to catch the > > oversight that patch 1 fixes. > > > > Applies to v4.7-rc7. No regressions in xfstests, and the sanity tests > > pass on x86_64 and MIPS. > > Thanks for fixing this up Omar. Any big endian friends want to try this > out in extended testing and make sure we've nailed it down? > Hi Omar & Chris, I will run fstests with this patchset applied on ppc64 BE and inform you about the results. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- chandan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
