On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 05:42:33PM +0200, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: > > At the absolute minimum, I think that these messages should go to > > stderr (like du does when it deosn't have permissions), and should go > > away with -q. They're still irritating, but at least you can get rid > > of them easily. > > If anything this should require a --verbose, not the other way > around. Maybe instead of breaking the output just indicate the > special status via "-- --" values, or default to 0.00? The '--' replacement values sound good to me (0.00 would be confusing). > Still, we're explicitly only interested in btrfs stuff and not > anything else, so printing non-information can only yield noise. I think the extra lines would happen mostly in scenario where directories are mountpoints and thus have a potentially different filesystem. If we print just a single line for a mountpoint (and not descend to it), I don't think it will create that much noise in the output. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
