Re: Out of space error even though there's 100 GB unused?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Stanislaw Kaminski
<stasheck.fora@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Chris, Alex, Hugo,
>
> Running now: Linux archb3 4.6.2-1-ARCH #1 PREEMPT Mon Jun 13 02:11:34
> MDT 2016 armv5tel GNU/Linux
>
> Seems to be working fine. I started a defrag, and it seems I'm getting
> my space back:
> $ sudo btrfs fi usage /home
> Overall:
>     Device size:                   1.81TiB
>     Device allocated:              1.73TiB
>     Device unallocated:           80.89GiB
>     Device missing:                  0.00B
>     Used:                          1.65TiB
>     Free (estimated):            159.63GiB      (min: 119.19GiB)
>     Data ratio:                       1.00
>     Metadata ratio:                   2.00
>     Global reserve:              512.00MiB      (used: 240.00KiB)
>
> Data,single: Size:1.72TiB, Used:1.65TiB
>    /dev/sda4       1.72TiB
>
> Metadata,DUP: Size:3.50GiB, Used:2.16GiB
>    /dev/sda4       7.00GiB
>
> System,DUP: Size:32.00MiB, Used:224.00KiB
>    /dev/sda4      64.00MiB
>
> Unallocated:
>    /dev/sda4      80.89GiB
>
> I deleted some unfinished torrent, ~10 GB in size, but as you can see,
> "Free space" has grown by 60 GB (re-checked now and it's 1 GB more now
> - so definitely caused by defrag).
>
> What has changed between 4.6.2 and 4.6.3?

https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/diff/?id=v4.6.3&id2=v4.6.2&dt=2

I see no change for Btrfs

> Cheers,
> Stan
>
> 2016-07-07 12:28 GMT+02:00 Stanislaw Kaminski <stasheck.fora@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> Too early report, the issue is back. Back to testing....
>>
>> 2016-07-07 12:18 GMT+02:00 Stanislaw Kaminski <stasheck.fora@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>> Hi all,
>>> I downgraded to 4.4.1-1 - all fine, 4.5.5.-1 - also fine, then got
>>> back to 4.6.3-2 - and it's still fine. Apparently running under
>>> different kernel somehow fixed the glitch (as far as I can test...).
>>>
>>> That leaves me with the other question: before issues, I 1.6 TiB was
>>> used, now all the tools report 1.7 TiB issued (except for btrfs fs du
>>> /home, this reports 1.6 TiB). How is that possible?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Stan
>>>
>>> 2016-07-06 19:42 GMT+02:00 Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 3:55 AM, Stanislaw Kaminski
>>>> <stasheck.fora@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>     Device unallocated:           97.89GiB
>>>>
>>>> There should be no problem creating any type of block group from this
>>>> much space. It's a bug.
>>>>
>>>> I would try regression testing. Kernel 4.5.7 has some changes that may
>>>> or may not relate to this (they should only relate when there is no
>>>> unallocated space left) so you could try 4.5.6 and 4.5.7. And also
>>>> 4.4.14.
>>>>
>>>> But also the kernel messages are important. There is this obscure
>>>> enospc with error -28, so either with or without enospc_debug mount
>>>> option is useful to try in 4.6.3 (I think it's less useful in older
>>>> kernels).
>>>>
>>>> But do try nospace_cache first. If that works, you could then mount
>>>> with clear_cache one time and see if that provides an enduring fix. It
>>>> can take some time to rebuild the cache after clear_cache is used.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Chris Murphy
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux