Re: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: use correct offset for reloc_inode in prealloc_file_extent_cluster()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



hello,

On 07/07/2016 03:54 AM, Liu Bo wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 06:37:52PM +0800, Wang Xiaoguang wrote:
In prealloc_file_extent_cluster(), btrfs_check_data_free_space() uses
wrong file offset for reloc_inode, it uses cluster->start and cluster->end,
which indeed are extent's bytenr. The correct value should be
cluster->[start|end] minus block group's start bytenr.

start bytenr   cluster->start
|              |     extent      |   extent   | ...| extent |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                block group reloc_inode                         |

Signed-off-by: Wang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------
  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
index 0477dca..abc2f69 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
@@ -3030,34 +3030,37 @@ int prealloc_file_extent_cluster(struct inode *inode,
  	u64 num_bytes;
  	int nr = 0;
  	int ret = 0;
+	u64 prealloc_start, prealloc_end;
BUG_ON(cluster->start != cluster->boundary[0]);
  	inode_lock(inode);
- ret = btrfs_check_data_free_space(inode, cluster->start,
-					  cluster->end + 1 - cluster->start);
+	start = cluster->start - offset;
+	end = cluster->end - offset;
+	ret = btrfs_check_data_free_space(inode, start, end + 1 - start);
  	if (ret)
  		goto out;
while (nr < cluster->nr) {
-		start = cluster->boundary[nr] - offset;
+		prealloc_start = cluster->boundary[nr] - offset;
  		if (nr + 1 < cluster->nr)
-			end = cluster->boundary[nr + 1] - 1 - offset;
+			prealloc_end = cluster->boundary[nr + 1] - 1 - offset;
  		else
-			end = cluster->end - offset;
+			prealloc_end = cluster->end - offset;
- lock_extent(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, start, end);
-		num_bytes = end + 1 - start;
-		ret = btrfs_prealloc_file_range(inode, 0, start,
+		lock_extent(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, prealloc_start,
+			    prealloc_end);
+		num_bytes = prealloc_end + 1 - prealloc_start;
+		ret = btrfs_prealloc_file_range(inode, 0, prealloc_start,
  						num_bytes, num_bytes,
-						end + 1, &alloc_hint);
-		unlock_extent(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, start, end);
+						prealloc_end + 1, &alloc_hint);
+		unlock_extent(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, prealloc_start,
+			      prealloc_end);
Changing names is unnecessary, we can pick up other names for btrfs_{check/free}_data_free_space().
OK, then the changes will be small, thanks.

Regards,
Xiaoguang Wang


Thanks,

-liubo

  		if (ret)
  			break;
  		nr++;
  	}
-	btrfs_free_reserved_data_space(inode, cluster->start,
-				       cluster->end + 1 - cluster->start);
+	btrfs_free_reserved_data_space(inode, start, end + 1 - start);
  out:
  	inode_unlock(inode);
  	return ret;
--
2.9.0



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux