Re: Recommended why to use btrfs for production?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Recommended why to use btrfs for production?
From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2016 21:09:06 +0200
In-reply-to: <dd952b29-1bea-59e1-1857-418b86951b47@gmail.com>

Hey.

Does anyone know whether the write hole issues have been fixed already?
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/RAID56 still mentions it.

Cheers,
Chris.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

References:
- Recommended why to use btrfs for production?
  - From: Martin
- Re: Recommended why to use btrfs for production?
  - From: Austin S. Hemmelgarn
- Re: Recommended why to use btrfs for production?
  - From: Martin
- Re: Recommended why to use btrfs for production?
  - From: Austin S. Hemmelgarn

Prev by Date: [PATCH v2] Btrfs: fix eb memory leak due to readpage failure
Next by Date: Re: btrfs
Previous by thread: Re: Recommended why to use btrfs for production?
Next by thread: Re: Recommended why to use btrfs for production?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux