With 4.5.5 the 'mount -o remount,rw' works like the wiki describes,
and is in my opinion contrary to the mount man page.
After the -o remount,rw following btrfs dev add VG/sprout, I get this partial:
# lsblk -o +UUID
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT UUID
│ └─VG-thintastic_tdata 253:1 0 90G 0 lvm
│ └─VG-thintastic-tpool 253:2 0 90G 0 lvm
│ ├─VG-thintastic 253:3 0 90G 0 lvm
│ ├─VG-seed 253:5 0 50G 0 lvm /mnt/0
59828c01-8354-43ac-a92d-f22d1b5d0e22
│ └─VG-sprout 253:6 0 50G 0 lvm
e8de3a52-34d1-46af-98c1-8620642be884
And
# mount
[...trimmed...]
/dev/mapper/VG-seed on /mnt/0 type btrfs
(rw,relatime,seclabel,space_cache,subvolid=5,subvol=/)
This is just wrong. The wrong volume UUID is associated with /mnt/0 by
lsblk. And mount shows VG/seed as rw, which is not possible because by
definition the seed is read-only.
I've always thought this was misleading and confusing.
Next I tried it with kernel-4.6.0...
[root@f24m ~]# losetup
NAME SIZELIMIT OFFSET AUTOCLEAR RO BACK-FILE DIO
/dev/loop0 0 0 0 0 /root/seed 0
/dev/loop1 0 0 0 0 /root/sprout 0
# mount
[...trimmed...]
/dev/loop0 on /mnt/0 type btrfs
(rw,relatime,seclabel,space_cache,subvolid=5,subvol=/)
So it's the same incorrect information as 4.5.5.
# lsblk -o +UUID
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT UUID
loop0 7:0 0 10G 0 loop /mnt/0 63288b0c-9216-4f11-aed4-cc054ae90e07
loop1 7:1 0 10G 0 loop 63288b0c-9216-4f11-aed4-cc054ae90e07
This is worse.
# btrfs fi show
Label: none uuid: 63288b0c-9216-4f11-aed4-cc054ae90e07
Total devices 2 FS bytes used 384.00KiB
devid 1 size 10.00GiB used 2.02GiB path /dev/loop0
devid 2 size 10.00GiB used 0.00B path /dev/loop1
So is this. Where is the new UUID for the newly created sprout volume?
/dev/loop0: UUID="63288b0c-9216-4f11-aed4-cc054ae90e07"
UUID_SUB="e379aedb-6d14-4d56-be7d-1772c9984bc5" TYPE="btrfs"
/dev/loop1: UUID="63288b0c-9216-4f11-aed4-cc054ae90e07"
UUID_SUB="b282f566-8382-468e-b9ec-f748244b703b" TYPE="btrfs"
Uhh? Identical UUIDs for seed and sproud? That's not right.
Same version of btrfs-progs in both cases, just different kernels, BUT
on different machines, and hence why LVM in the first case, and
fallocated files on loop for the second. I'm not sure what's causing
this.
----
Chris Murphy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
