R: Re: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs-progs: utils: Introduce new pseudo random API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





>----Messaggio originale----
>Da: "Qu Wenruo" <quwenruo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Data: 26/05/2016 2.38
>A: <kreijack@xxxxxxxxx>
>Ogg: Re: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs-progs: utils: Introduce new pseudo random API
>
>
>
>Goffredo Baroncelli wrote on 2016/05/25 18:15 +0200:
>> On 2016-05-25 06:14, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>> +void rand_seed(u64 seed)
>>> +{
>>> +	int i;
>>> +	/* only use the last 48 bits */
>>> +	for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
>>> +		seeds[i] = (unsigned short)(seed ^ (unsigned short)(-1));
>>> +		seed >>= 16;
>>> +	}
>>> +	seed_initlized = 1;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +u32 rand_u32(void)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct timeval tv;
>>> +
>>> +	if (seed_initlized)
>>> +		return nrand48(seeds);
>>> +
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * It's possible to use /dev/random, but we don't need that true
>>> +	 * random number nor want to wait for entropy,
>>> +	 * since we're only using random API to do corruption to test.
>>> +	 * Time and pid/ppid based seed would be good enough, and won't
>>> +	 * cause sleep for entropy pool.
>>> +	 */
>>> +	gettimeofday(&tv, 0);
>>> +	seeds[0] = getpid() ^ (tv.tv_sec & 0xFFFF);
>>> +	seeds[1] = getppid() ^ (tv.tv_usec & 0xFFFF);
>>> +	seeds[2] = (tv.tv_sec ^ tv.tv_usec) >> 16;
>>> +	seed_initlized = 1;
>>> +
>>> +	return (u32)nrand48(seeds);
>>> +}
>>
>>
>> Just for my curiosity, which is the advantage of rand48() respect to rand() 
if we utilize only the
>> lower 32 bit ? It wouldn't be more simple to use:
>
>Of course rand() is my first candidate.
>
>However a quick check on manpage of rand(3) shows, the up limit of 
>RAND_MAX, is not always the same.
>
>In my system, RAND_MAX is 2^31 -1, while example code from rand(3) 
>assumes the up limit is 32767.

In glibc RAND_MAX is always ~2^31: http://www.gnu.
org/software/libc/manual/html_node/ISO-Random.html

If it is true for glibc, it should be true also for the others linux libc 
(dietlibc[1], musl[2]);  I think that assuming in linux RAND_MAX  = 2^31-1 
should be safe.

BR
Goffredo

[1] https://github.com/ensc/dietlibc/blob/master/include/stdlib.h#L101
[2] https://github.com/cloudius-systems/musl/blob/master/include/stdlib.h#L81


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux