On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:31:01AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > > This could be made static (with thread local storage) so the state does > > not get regenerated all the time. Possibly it could be initialize from > > some true random source, not time or pid. > > I also considered true random source like /dev/random, but since it's > possible to wait for entropy pool, it would be quite slow and confusing > for users. How would it be confusing? We'll once seed the random generator from /dev/random, reading 3 * 16bit for the nrand generator context. > So time with pid seems good enough. Only as a fallback if /dev/random is not available at all. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
