Solve the hard problems first (dedupe with a disk backend, make in-memory
perform), then come asking for inclusion of your feature. Again, this I
would say about the patches regardless of whose name is on them.
--Mark
David has already agreed on the idea to merge in-memory backend first.
And the original idea of BTRFS_DEBUG (I prefer to use independent
Kconfig though) also comes from him.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/54704/focus=54784
We have also expressed the idea to merge in-memory dedupe backend frist
in v9 patchset cover letter.
Thanks,
Qu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
