On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 10:40:02AM -0700, Liu Bo wrote:
> > > + printk(KERN_ERR "BTRFS: bytes_used is too small %llu\n",
> > > + btrfs_super_bytes_used(sb));
> > > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > > + }
> > > + if (btrfs_super_stripesize(sb) != 4096) {
> >
> > This is too strict. The stripesize is unused, but we not force it to be
> > 4k, a multiple of nodesize/sectorsize should be enough.
>
> Hmm, in fact stripesize is used in find_free_extent(),
>
> find_free_extent() {
> ...
> search_start = ALIGN(offset, root->stripesize);
> ...
> }
>
> and in open_ctree(),
>
> open_ctree() {
> ...
> stripesize = btrfs_super_stripesize(disk_super);
> ...
> tree_root->stripesize = stripesize;
> ...
> }
>
> btrfs_read_roots() {
> ...
> btrfs_read_tree_root() --> __setup_root(..., tree_root->stripesize, ...)
> }
>
> Thus, this stripesize has to be sectorsize at least.
Yes, and must be power of two because of ALIGN for now.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
