Re: [PATCH RFC 08/16] btrfs-progs: fsck: Introduce function to check an extent

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/25/2016 11:48 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
From: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Introduce function check_extent_item() using previous introduced
functions.

With previous function to check referencer and backref, this function
can be quite easy.

Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 cmds-check.c | 113 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 113 insertions(+)

diff --git a/cmds-check.c b/cmds-check.c
index 5588898..7f9f848 100644
--- a/cmds-check.c
+++ b/cmds-check.c
@@ -325,6 +325,9 @@ struct root_item_info {
 #define UNALIGNED_BYTES	(1 << 2) /* Some bytes are not aligned */
 #define MISSING_REFERENCER (1 << 3) /* Referencer not found */
 #define BAD_REFERENCER	(1 << 4) /* Referencer found, but not mismatch */
+#define CROSSING_STRIPE_BOUNDARY (1 << 4) /* For kernel scrub workaround */
+#define BAD_ITEM_SIZE	(1 << 5) /* Bad item size */
+#define UNKNOWN_TYPE	(1 << 6) /* Unknown type */

 static void *print_status_check(void *p)
 {
@@ -9013,6 +9016,116 @@ out:
 	return 0;
 }

+/*
+ * This function will check a given extent item, including its backref and
+ * itself (like crossing stripe boundary and type)
+ *
+ * Since we don't use extent_record anymore, introduce new error bit
+ */
+static int check_extent_item(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
+			     struct extent_buffer *eb, int slot, int metadata)
+{
+	struct btrfs_extent_item *ei;
+	struct btrfs_extent_inline_ref *iref;
+	struct btrfs_extent_data_ref *dref;
+	unsigned long end;
+	unsigned long ptr;
+	int type;
+	u32 nodesize = btrfs_super_nodesize(fs_info->super_copy);
+	u32 item_size = btrfs_item_size_nr(eb, slot);
+	u64 flags;
+	u64 offset;
+	int level;
+	struct btrfs_key key;
+	int ret;
+	int err = 0;
+
+	btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(eb, &key, slot);
+
+	/*
+	 * XXX: Do we really need to handle such historic
+	 * extent structure?
+	 */
+	if (item_size < sizeof(*ei)) {
+#ifdef BTRFS_COMPAT_EXTENT_TREE_V0
+		struct btrfs_extent_item_v0 *ei0;
+
+		BUG_ON(item_size != sizeof(*ei0));
+		return 1;
+#else
+		BUG();
+#endif
+	}

We can actually probably start phasing it out, but either way no BUG(), just return an error, the whole point of btrfsck is to find disk corruption, if we BUG that's just annoying for users.

+
+	if (metadata && check_crossing_stripes(key.objectid, eb->len)) {
+		error("bad metadata [%llu, %llu) crossing stripe boundary",
+		      key.objectid, key.objectid + nodesize);
+		err |= CROSSING_STRIPE_BOUNDARY;
+	}
+
+	ei = btrfs_item_ptr(eb, slot, struct btrfs_extent_item);
+	flags = btrfs_extent_flags(eb, ei);
+
+	ptr = (unsigned long)(ei + 1);
+	if (flags & BTRFS_EXTENT_FLAG_TREE_BLOCK && !metadata) {
+		struct btrfs_tree_block_info *info;
+
+		info = (struct btrfs_tree_block_info *)ptr;
+		level = btrfs_tree_block_level(eb, info);
+		ptr += sizeof(struct btrfs_tree_block_info);
+	} else
+		level = key.offset;

Adhere to the normal kernel style guidelines.  Thanks,

Josef
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux