...in the matter of partition size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quick question: Supposed I have n-number of storage pods (physical
servers with n-number of physical hhds). The end deployment will be
btrfs at the brick/block level with a distributed file system on top.
Keeping in mind that my overriding goal is to have high availability
and the mechanism whereby the lost of a drive or multiple drives in a
single pod will not jeopardize data.
>>>>>Question<<<<<
Does partitioning the physical drives and creating btrfs filesystem on
each partition, then configuring each partition as individual
bricks/blocks offer ANY added benefits over grouping the entire pod
into a drive pool and using that pool as a single block/brick to
expose to the distributed filesystem?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux