Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix qgroup accounting when snapshotting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Josef Bacik wrote on 2016/04/26 10:24 -0400:
The new qgroup stuff needs the quota accounting to be run before doing the
inherit, unfortunately they need the commit root switch to happen at a specific
time for this to work properly.  Fix this by delaying the inherit until after we
do the qgroup accounting, and remove the inherit and accounting dance in
create_pending_snapshot.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxx>
---
 fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 fs/btrfs/transaction.h |  1 +
 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
index 7c7671d..aa3025a 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
@@ -1353,6 +1353,7 @@ static noinline int create_pending_snapshot(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 	pending->error = btrfs_find_free_objectid(tree_root, &objectid);
 	if (pending->error)
 		goto no_free_objectid;
+	pending->objectid = objectid;

 	/*
 	 * Make qgroup to skip current new snapshot's qgroupid, as it is
@@ -1559,24 +1560,6 @@ static noinline int create_pending_snapshot(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 		btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, root, ret);
 		goto fail;
 	}
-
-	/*
-	 * account qgroup counters before qgroup_inherit()
-	 */
-	ret = btrfs_qgroup_prepare_account_extents(trans, fs_info);
-	if (ret)
-		goto fail;
-	ret = btrfs_qgroup_account_extents(trans, fs_info);
-	if (ret)
-		goto fail;
-	ret = btrfs_qgroup_inherit(trans, fs_info,
-				   root->root_key.objectid,
-				   objectid, pending->inherit);
-	if (ret) {
-		btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, root, ret);
-		goto fail;
-	}
-
 fail:
 	pending->error = ret;
 dir_item_existed:
@@ -1599,15 +1582,35 @@ no_free_objectid:
 static noinline int create_pending_snapshots(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 					     struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
 {
+	struct btrfs_pending_snapshot *pending;
+	struct list_head *head = &trans->transaction->pending_snapshots;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	list_for_each_entry(pending, head, list) {
+		ret = create_pending_snapshot(trans, fs_info, pending);
+		if (ret)
+			break;
+	}
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static noinline int inherit_pending_snapshots(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
+					      struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
+{
 	struct btrfs_pending_snapshot *pending, *next;
 	struct list_head *head = &trans->transaction->pending_snapshots;
 	int ret = 0;

 	list_for_each_entry_safe(pending, next, head, list) {
+		struct btrfs_root *root = pending->root;
 		list_del(&pending->list);
-		ret = create_pending_snapshot(trans, fs_info, pending);
-		if (ret)
+		ret = btrfs_qgroup_inherit(trans, fs_info,
+					   root->root_key.objectid,
+					   pending->objectid, pending->inherit);

It's too late to call qgroup_inherit() here.
As we already inserted DIR_ITEM into parent_root.

This will cause qgroup difference, if parent_root is also the src_root.


But your fix provides a very potential fix method.
If we didn't do the DIR_ITEM insert in create_pending_snapshot, but do the insert after all qgroup_inherit() is done,
the problem may have a better fix.

Although I am still concerning about the DIR_ITEM insert.
As we still need to account them, and since we must run qgroup accounting before qgroup_inherit(), I'm afraid we still need to do the commit hack though.

Thanks,
Qu
+		if (ret) {
+			btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, root, ret);
 			break;
+		}
 	}
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -2084,6 +2087,14 @@ int btrfs_commit_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 		goto scrub_continue;
 	}

+	/* Inherit the qgroup information for the snapshots. */
+	ret = inherit_pending_snapshots(trans, root->fs_info);
+	if (ret) {
+		mutex_unlock(&root->fs_info->reloc_mutex);
+		goto scrub_continue;
+	}
+
+
 	ret = commit_cowonly_roots(trans, root);
 	if (ret) {
 		mutex_unlock(&root->fs_info->tree_log_mutex);
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.h b/fs/btrfs/transaction.h
index 72be51f..c118e6e 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.h
@@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ struct btrfs_pending_snapshot {
 	/* block reservation for the operation */
 	struct btrfs_block_rsv block_rsv;
 	u64 qgroup_reserved;
+	u64 objectid;
 	/* extra metadata reseration for relocation */
 	int error;
 	bool readonly;



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux