Am 21.04.2016 um 07:43 schrieb Qu Wenruo: > There are already unmerged patches which will partly do the mdadm level behavior, like automatically change to degraded mode without making the fs RO. > > The original patchset: > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/48335 The description of thix patch says: "Although the one-size-fit-all solution is quite safe, it's too strict if data and metadata has different duplication level." ... "This patchset will introduce a new per-chunk degradable check for btrfs, allow above case to succeed, and it's quite small anyway." My raid1 is "-m raid1 -d raid1". Both the same duplication level. Would that patch make any difference? And: What do I need to do to test this in "debian stable"? I am not a programmer - but I know how to use git and how to compile with proper configuration directions. Matthias > Or the latest patchset inside Anand Jain's auto-replace patchset: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/55446 > > Thanks, > Qu >> >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> >> > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
