Re: Install to or Recover RAID Array Subvolume Root?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn
<ahferroin7@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
> I don't know about the current state of the Debian installer, but I know
> back when I used Debian regularly and used the standard text based
> installer, as long as I didn't format things from the UI, I could provision
> the filesystems however the hell I wanted manually and point the installer
> at the appropriate ones for each mount point, and it worked.

No doubt this is a catch 22. I think it's reasonable for an installer
to have an aging logic that allows it to be more conservative than the
kernel's support for compat_ro_flags and incompat_flags, and refuse to
install if it's not recently formatted.

Now that I go look for this, I'm not sure what either flags offset
0x38 or compat_flags offset 0xac are about.

Also, I didn't mention that Anaconda does require root fs to be in a
new subvolume. It won't install to either subvolid 5, or any other
existing subvolume.

-- 
Chris Murphy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux