Re: "/tmp/mnt.", and not honouring compression

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le 31/03/2016 22:49, Chris Murray a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to troubleshoot a ceph cluster which doesn't seem to be
> honouring BTRFS compression on some OSDs. Can anyone offer some help? Is
> it likely to be a ceph issue or a BTRFS one? Or something else? I've
> asked on ceph-users already, but not received a response yet.
>
> Config is set to mount with "noatime,nodiratime,compress-force=lzo"
>
> Some OSDs have been getting much more full than others though, which I
> think is something to do with these 'tmp' mounts e.g. below:

Note that there are other reasons for unbalanced storage on Ceph OSD.
The main reason is too few PGs (there's a calculator on ceph.com, google
for it).
These tmp mounts aren't normal, you should find out what is causing them.

So it might be a Ceph issue (too few PGs) or a system issue (some
component trying to use your filesystems for its own purposes).
You might have more luck on the ceph-users list (post your Ceph version,
the result of ceph osd tree, df on all OSDs and hunt for the process
creating theses mounts on your systems).

It's probably not a Btrfs issue (I run a Ceph on Btrfs cluster in
production and I've never seen this kind of problem).

Lionel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux