>> Would you please try the following patch based on v4.5 btrfs-progs? >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8706891/ >> >> According to your output, all the output is false alert. >> All the extent starting bytenr can be divided by 64K, and I think at >> initial time, its 'max_size' may be set to 0, causing "start + 0 - 1" >> to be inside previous 64K range. >> >> The patch would update cross_stripe every time the extent is updated, >> so such temporary false alert should disappear. > > Applied and no more reports of crossing stripe boundary - thanks. > > Will this go into 4.5.1 or 4.5.2? It is not in 4.5.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
