Re: Major HDD performance degradation on btrfs receive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2016-03-16 02:51, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:23 PM, Nazar Mokrynskyi <nazar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sounds like a really good idea!

I'll try to implement in in my backup tool, but it might take some time to
see real benefit from it (or no benefit:)).

There is a catch. I'm not sure how much testing deleting 100
subvolumes at once gets. It should work. I haven't looked in xfstests
to see how much of this is being tested. So it's possible you're
testing it. So be ready.
I've actually tested bulk removal of large numbers of snapshots multiple times before (it's actually one of the things that isn't in xfstests that I check when testing patches, I usually test power of two groups from 16 up to 256 at a time). It works, but it may tie up most of the disk bandwidth for a while depending on what type of storage you're using.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux