On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:59 PM, Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'm a little mystified how btrfs check reports a problem with the > superblock, and yet this filesystem can still be mounted and used? If > it mounts rw then resize is possible but why would it be wrong in the > first place? Yes you are right. I just focussed on the 'Superblock bytenr is larger than device size' part. btrfs check will actually output that text on a mounted filesystem anyhow. The other question is: What is mounted on /media/tempdisk/ ? At least I think a check of the current 200GiB fs is needed. As it is a rootfs and encrypted, some work is needed to make that happen. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
