On 2016/03/10 22:27, David Sterba wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 08:04:59AM +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote:It's unnecessary since it's always 1. Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- This patch can be applied to devel (commit b2bdd0da8969). --- cmds-device.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/cmds-device.c b/cmds-device.c index cb470af..78d6535 100644 --- a/cmds-device.c +++ b/cmds-device.c @@ -246,7 +246,6 @@ static const char * const cmd_device_scan_usage[] = { static int cmd_device_scan(int argc, char **argv) { int i; - int devstart = 1; int all = 0; int ret = 0; @@ -282,7 +281,7 @@ static int cmd_device_scan(int argc, char **argv) goto out; } - for( i = devstart ; i < argc ; i++ ){ + for (i = 1; i < argc; i++) {Actually it needs to be set to optind before the for cycle, otherwise: # btrfs device scan -- /dev/sda ERROR: not a block device: --
Thank you for your comment. I'll fix it. Satoru -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
