On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:09:29AM +0800, Anand Jain wrote: > > > Please send any followup changes on top of the current devel patch. > > I kind of missed this point at the wiki. > -- > The git repositories on kernel.org are not used for development > or integration branches. > -- > Thanks for the update on how things work at your end, which helps > to keep loss of productive at low. The development branch workflow in progs has been used for months, I don't know why that would be news for you. > Suggest that we need to update similar for the kernel > section as well. I see some of the inactive branches > being mentioned there. And its bit confusing as of now. That's probably the section about btrfs-next tree that is not active for a long time. Apparently nobody cared enough to fix it which just underlines lack of active wiki editors. I don't understand why you bring it up now, you're a long-term contributor so you're supposed to know how the patches get merged. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
