Re: btrfs-image run time

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 07:15:24PM +0100, Garmine 42 wrote:
> According to the manpage duplicate -s is valid and the high CPU usage is
> intended. Although a warning could be valid in case of -ss.

Or use a different letter. Anyway, that was my stupidity and no
developer time should be wasted for that. btrfs-image behaves as
documented, everything else was a problem existing between chair and
keyboard. Sorry for the noise.

Greetings
Marc

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc Haber         | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Leimen, Germany    |  lose things."    Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402
Nordisch by Nature |  How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 6224 1600421
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux