Re: btrfs raid

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 5:01 AM, Rich Freeman <rich0@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I think it depends on how you define "old."  I think that 3.18.28
>> would be fine as it is a supported longterm.
>
> For raid56? I disagree. There were substantial raid56 code changes in
> 3.19 that were not backported to 3.18.

Of course.  I was referring to raid1.  I wouldn't run raid56 without
an expectation of occasionally losing everything on any version of
linux.  :)  If I were just testing it or I could tolerate losing
everything occasionally I'd probably track the current stable, if not
mainline, depending on my goals.

-- 
Rich
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux