On 04/18/2015 01:29 AM, David Sterba wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 09:19:11AM +0000, Hugo Mills wrote:
In, some article i read that future there will be more chunk tree/ extent
tree for single btrfs. Is this true.
I recall, many moons ago, Chris saying that there probably wouldn't
be.
More extent trees tied to a set of fs trees/subvolumes would be very
useful for certain usecases *cough*encryption*cough*.
I didn't understand in full what's the idea here, but let met try..
would it not defeat the purpose of encryption which is not to let
disk have the un-encrypted data ? Looks like I am missing something
here.
Thanks, Anand
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
