On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 09:59:27AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 11:46:16AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote: > > We'll definitely move in line with the common API over time. Thanks > > Anand for starting this! > > > > I'd prefer that we keep it per-subvolume for now, just because > > subvolumes are so cheap and because it seems like a better collection > > point for general use. But as the other filesystems add features we'll > > make sure and keep parity with what users expect. > > We already have per-file encryption in f2fs and ext4, and both have > a compatible userspace API and ABI. It would be a pitty to deviate > from that intead of reusing it, and if needed extending it. I wasn't very clear here sorry. per-subvolume is my favorite way, but we'll go with the existing ABIs as well. There's no reason to be different. -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
