David Sterba wrote on 2015/04/17 19:29 +0200:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 09:19:11AM +0000, Hugo Mills wrote:
In, some article i read that future there will be more chunk tree/ extent
tree for single btrfs. Is this true.
I recall, many moons ago, Chris saying that there probably wouldn't
be.
More extent trees tied to a set of fs trees/subvolumes would be very
useful for certain usecases *cough*encryption*cough*.
BTW, will such design makes reflink between different set of extents
fallback to normal copy?
And I'm pretty sure that inband dedup will be affected too...
Thanks,
Qu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
