[PATCH] btrfs: async-thread: Fixed a brace coding style issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Braces aren't needed if it's only a single-line statement.
checkpatch.pl confirmed this.
This is now fixed.

Signed-off-by: Simon Quigley <tsimonq2@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/btrfs/async-thread.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
index 5fb60ea..7914dd2 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
@@ -227,9 +227,9 @@ static inline void thresh_exec_hook(struct __btrfs_workqueue *wq)
 out:
 	spin_unlock(&wq->thres_lock);
 
-	if (need_change) {
+	if (need_change)
 		workqueue_set_max_active(wq->normal_wq, wq->current_active);
-	}
+
 }
 
 static void run_ordered_work(struct __btrfs_workqueue *wq)
-- 
2.7.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux