You're right, I misunderstood the mail and get a little emotional.
And sorry for that inappropriate reply.
BTW, the new patchset will be sent to btrfs mail list in coming hour, if
you're interested in inband de-dup, you can try the following github
repos to build and test in-band de-dup:
Kernel
https://github.com/adam900710/linux.git wang_dedup
Btrfs-progs
https://github.com/adam900710/btrfs-progs.git dedup
And if you have any concern on the implementation or the dedup related
Document, I'm happy to hear.
(I was a little emotional just because some unexpected bugs that time.)
Thanks,
Qu
Al wrote on 2016/01/22 11:33 +0000:
With respect Chris, if you intentionally ignore all of the other context
clues ("keep up the great work", "looking forward to using it"), you could
come to that conclusion. You'd have to try really really hard.
I wasn't criticising your buddy in anyway, quite the opposite. Can we move
on, now? There are better ways of spending our time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
