Hi, David,
On 2016/01/22 23:00, David Sterba wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 09:13:25AM +0900, Tsutomu Itoh wrote:
ENOTSUPP should not be returned to the user program.
(cf. include/linux/errno.h)
Therefore, EOPNOTSUPP is used instead of ENOTSUPP.
I'm not sure that EOPNOTSUPP is the right error code here. I'd rather
make it EINVAL, the bug we're talking about is a new type of inode
outside of the S_IFMT bits. "not supported" would mean we don't support
it but we could in theory.
Thanks for review.
In the meaning that btrfs-send is not supporting a new type of inode now,
EOPNOTSUPP is acceptable, I think.
Thanks,
Tsutomu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
