On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:19:56AM +0100, David Sterba wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 11:10:01AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > > Not sure if it's intended or just a small miss, in btrfs-progs ctree.h, > > there is BTRFS_FEATURE_COMPAT_RO_FREE_SPACE_TREE, but > > BTRFS_FEATURE_COMPAT_RO_SUPP is still 0, not including FREE_SPACE_TREE. > > > > Is it intended as current btrfsck doesn't support to modify fs with new > > free space cache tree? > > In progs it's unintended and buggy, the kernel side is buggy as well. > I'm fixing it. So it's just the btrfs-progs side, kernel side is fine. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
