On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 05:03:40PM +0900, Tsutomu Itoh wrote:
> } else if (strncmp(args[0].from, "no", 2) == 0) {
> compress_type = "no";
> btrfs_clear_opt(info->mount_opt, COMPRESS);
> btrfs_clear_opt(info->mount_opt, FORCE_COMPRESS);
> compress_force = false;
> + no_compress++;
> } else {
...
> + if ((btrfs_test_opt(root, COMPRESS) &&
> + (info->compress_type != saved_compress_type ||
> + compress_force != saved_compress_force)) ||
> + (!btrfs_test_opt(root, COMPRESS) &&
> + no_compress == 1)) {
If there are more than one 'compress=no' then the message won't be
printed. I don't see a reason for doing no_compress++ above.
> + btrfs_info(root->fs_info,
> + "%s %s compression",
> + (compress_force) ? "force" : "use",
> + compress_type);
> + }
> + compress_force = false;
> break;
> case Opt_ssd:
> btrfs_set_and_info(root, SSD,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
