On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 07:23:01 -0500 "Austin S. Hemmelgarn" <ahferroin7@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 768 I don't know, the other two though would provide proper > stripe-alignment on a 8 or 14 disk hardware RAID6 setup using 512 > byte sectors (that is, one stripe in BTRFS would span the full array). > > I personally think it should be restricted to multiples of 512, as > that is the smallest sector size on any disk drive that is > realistically usable with BTRFS. That would also provide 4k support, > and beyond that 64k (which is where the really big drives are headed > anyway), and also provide the ability to get proper stripe alignment > on almost any hardware RAID configuration. Alright, I guess that makes the implementation slightly easier. I will implement it as only multiples of 512. Thanks for you input everyone. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
