On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 07:07:24AM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > I really have no idea if this is safe or not. > > julia > > On Tue, 12 Jan 2016, kbuild test robot wrote: > > > CC: kbuild-all@xxxxxx > > TO: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@xxxxxxx> > > CC: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx> > > > > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux misc-cleanups-4.5 > > head: a7ca42256d9fad572fb7f2c471514d7d3572b1db > > commit: a7ca42256d9fad572fb7f2c471514d7d3572b1db [9/9] btrfs: use list_for_each_entry* in backref.c > > :::::: branch date: 5 days ago > > :::::: commit date: 5 days ago > > > > >> fs/btrfs/backref.c:565:1-20: iterator with update on line 577 Sorry for the trouble caused. It's probably unsafe. I updated my patch to fix this problem. - Geliang Geliang Tang (1): btrfs: use list_for_each_entry* in backref.c fs/btrfs/backref.c | 25 +++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) -- 2.5.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
