Re: evidence of persistent state, despite device disconnects

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2016-01-09 11:55, Duncan wrote:
> (a minimum of two devices are required to create raid1 chunks, since two
> copies are required and they can't be on the same device).

I think that this is the problem: BTRFS should allocate a new chunk as RAID1, even if only one device is available. It is already capable to use a RAID1 chunk in degraded mode, so it shouldn't be so difficult to create new chunk RAID1 when only a one disk is available.

Anyway I agree with Chris about the fact that btrfs sometime gives incorrect information about the devices. In the past I proposed to abandon the current model where the device are "per-registered" before the mount command asynchronously.
I wrote a mount helper which does a scan at the mount time [1]; this would reduce the window time where a device disappearing could cause confusion.

BR
G.Baroncelli


[1] https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg39429.html
-- 
gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijackATinwind.it>
Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D  17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux