Re: btrfs fail behavior when a device vanishes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Hugo Mills <hugo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 01:11:25PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> This is a torture test, no data is at risk.
>>
>> Two devices, btrfs raid1 with some stuff on them.
>> Copy from that array, elsewhere.
>> During copy, yank the active device.
>>
>> dmesg shows many of these:
>>
>> [ 7179.373245] BTRFS error (device sdc1): bdev /dev/sdc1 errs: wr
>> 652123, rd 697237, flush 0, corrupt 0, gen 0
>>
>> Why are the write errors nearly as high as the read errors, when there
>> is only a copy from this device happening?
>
>    I'm guessing completely here, but maybe it's trying to write
> corrected data to sdc1, because the original read failed?
>

Egads. OK that makes sense.

-- 
Chris Murphy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux