I read an implication in a different thread that defrag and autodefrag behave differently in that autodefrag is more snapshot friendly for COW data. Did I understand that correctly? I have not been doing defrag on my virtual machine image directory because I do use a snapshot schedule and the way I understood things, a defrag would basically decouple the live data from the snapshots and greatly increase utilization. It sounded like autodefrag does not have this problem? If that's true, is there any case where it would not be best practice to mount with autodefrag enabled? Thanks, Donald -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
