On Mon, 2015-12-14 at 18:32 +0100, David Sterba wrote: > I've read the discussions around the change and from the user's POV > I'd > suggest to add another mount option that would be just an alias for > any > mount options that would implement the 'hard-ro' semantics. Nice to hear... > Say it's called 'nowr' though I'm deeply saddened, that you don't like my proposed "hard-ro" which I though about for nearly 1s ;-) > mount -o ro,nowr /dev/sdx /mnt Sounds reasonable... especially I mean that, as long ro's documentation points to "nowr" and clearly states whether both (ro+nowr) are required to get the desired behaviour, I have no very strong opinion, whether both (ro+nowr) should be required, or whether nowr, should imply ro. Though I think, the later may be better. Thanks, Chris.
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
