RE: freeze_bdev and scrub/re-balance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thank you liubo for your reply.

But I am very clear with your meaning of "It should be like that with COW enabled"

I'd like to confirm, if defragment/scrub/rebalance is in progress, and my code calls "freeze_bdev" (in kernel code, or in user space code via ioctl), I can get a consistent file system state. "consistent file system state" means, if I run a LVM snapshot (or hardware snapshot, or even "dd" if it can do that quickly) after call freeze_bdev, the snapshot is file system consistent.


Thanks
Mike


-----Original Message-----
From: Liu Bo [mailto:bo.li.liu@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 1:22 AM
To: Wang, Zhiye
Cc: linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: freeze_bdev and scrub/re-balance

On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 09:57:18AM +0000, Wang, Zhiye wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> 
> If I understand it correctly, defragment operation is done in user space tools, while scrub/re-balance is done in kernel thread.

Defragment is done via a IOCTL, so it also works in the kernel.

> 
> 
> So, if my kernel module calls freeze_bdev when scrub/re-balance is in progress, will I still be able to get a consistent file system state?

It should be like that with COW enabled.

Thanks,

-liubo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux