On 12/11/15 4:21 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: >> Note that Btrfs is >> > not unique, XFS v5 does a very similar thing with volume UUID as >> > well, >> > and resulted in this change: >> > http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/2015-April/041267.html > Do you mean that xfs may suffer from the same issues that we're talking > about here? If so, one should probably give them a notice. That was disabled temporarily because changing the fs UUID meant that every piece of checksummed metadata with an embedded UUID would then mismatch. It was fixed (re-allowed) with ce748ea xfs: create new metadata UUID field and incompat flag in the kernel and 9c4e12f xfsprogs: Add new sb_meta_uuid field, update userspace tools to manipulate it in xfsprogs. -Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
