Qu Wenruo wrote on 2015/12/02 17:06 +0800:
Russell Coker wrote on 2015/12/02 17:25 +1100:
On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 06:05:09 AM Eric Sandeen wrote:
yes, xfs does; we have "-o norecovery" if you don't want that, or need
to mount a filesystem with a dirty log on a readonly device.
That option also works with Ext3/4 so it seems to be a standard way of
dealing
with this. I think that BTRFS should do what Ext3/4 and XFS do in this
regard.
BTW, does -o norecovery implies -o ro?
If not, how does it keep the filesystem consistent?
I'd like to follow that ext2/xfs behavior, but I'm not familiar with
those filesystems.
Thanks,
Qu
OK, norecovery implies ro.
So I think it's possible to do the same thing for btrfs.
I'll try to do it soon.
Thanks,
Qu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
