On 11/30/15, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Of course you can also try compress-force(=lzo the default > compression so the =spec isn't required), which should give > you slightly better performance than zlib, but also a bit > less efficient compression in terms of size saved. lzo perf relative to zlib (A very very rough comparison) Compress/Decompress times: 1/3 - 1/2 (which is significant) Output Size: %10-20 larger -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
