This is more readable.
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
I think the following strlcpy may be somewhat fragile since obviously
ds->name and p overlap. It certainly relies on strlcpy doing a forward
copy, and since different architectures can have their own strlcpy,
that's hard to verify (and also won't necessarily continue to hold).
Maybe
if (p != ds->name)
memmove(ds->name, p, strlen(p)+1);
instead.
fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c b/fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c
index 0340c57bf377..55a5cff390b9 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c
@@ -95,6 +95,7 @@
#include <linux/genhd.h>
#include <linux/blkdev.h>
#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
+#include <linux/string.h>
#include "ctree.h"
#include "disk-io.h"
#include "hash.h"
@@ -3136,11 +3137,7 @@ int btrfsic_mount(struct btrfs_root *root,
ds->state = state;
bdevname(ds->bdev, ds->name);
ds->name[BDEVNAME_SIZE - 1] = '\0';
- for (p = ds->name; *p != '\0'; p++);
- while (p > ds->name && *p != '/')
- p--;
- if (*p == '/')
- p++;
+ p = kbasename(ds->name);
strlcpy(ds->name, p, sizeof(ds->name));
btrfsic_dev_state_hashtable_add(ds,
&btrfsic_dev_state_hashtable);
--
2.6.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
