> It's just freed up lots of space. You'll probably find that your > "total" value for data in btrfs fi df is close to (but not exactly) 66 > GiB now, if you've just run a full unfiltered balance. (The difference > being made up of metadata). I think i need to dive more into the details of btrfs to finally grasp the details here > There's a repo of "useful btrfs scripts" that David Sterba looks > after. Great pointer! I think you refer to https://github.com/kdave/btrfsmaintenance and it indeed looks very promising. >> Should I pick "btrfs show" in favor to "btrfs fi df" to learn about an impending "disk full" situation? > In the general case, you need both of them to make sense of it. Duh.... I'll better... ehh... try to find some backported btrfs-profs supporting `usage`. >> Will newer kernels do the balance on their own? > I think it's on the "projects" list on the wiki [..] aware of anyone working on it. Ok - which is another +1 for looking at David 's repo. Thanks! - Ben -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
