[PATCH V7 13/13] Btrfs: Return valid delalloc range when the page does not have PG_Dirty flag set or has been invalidated

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The following issue was observed when running generic/095 test on
subpagesize-blocksize patchset.

Assume that we are trying to write a dirty page that is mapping file offset
range [159744, 163839].

writepage_delalloc()
  find_lock_delalloc_range(*start = 159744, *end = 0)
    find_delalloc_range()
      Returns range [X, Y] where (X > 163839)
    lock_delalloc_pages()
      One of the pages in range [X, Y] has dirty flag cleared;
      Loop once more restricting the delalloc range to span only
      PAGE_CACHE_SIZE bytes;
    find_delalloc_range()
      Returns range [356352, 360447];
    lock_delalloc_pages()
      The page [356352, 360447] has dirty flag cleared;
    Returns with *start = 159744 and *end = 0;
  *start = *end + 1;
  find_lock_delalloc_range(*start = 1, *end = 0)
    Finds and returns delalloc range [1, 12288];
  cow_file_range()
    Clears delalloc range [1, 12288]
    Create ordered extent for range [1, 12288]

The ordered extent thus created above breaks the rule that extents have to be
aligned to the filesystem's block size.

In cases where lock_delalloc_pages() fails (either due to PG_dirty flag being
cleared or the page no longer being a member of the inode's page cache), this
patch sets and returns the delalloc range that was found by
find_delalloc_range().

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index d093643..9c5891a 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -1794,6 +1794,8 @@ again:
 			goto again;
 		} else {
 			found = 0;
+			*start = delalloc_start;
+			*end = delalloc_end;
 			goto out_failed;
 		}
 	}
-- 
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux