Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: Improve FL_KEEP_SIZE handling in fallocate.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Davide Italiano <dccitaliano@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 7:08 AM, David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 10:09:15PM -0700, Davide Italiano wrote:
>>> - We call inode_size_ok() only if FL_KEEP_SIZE isn't specified.
>>> - As an optimisation we can skip the call if (off + len)
>>>   isn't greater than the current size of the file. This operation
>>>   is called under the lock so the less work we do, the better.
>>> - If we call inode_size_ok() pass to it the correct value rather
>>>   than a more conservative estimation.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Davide Italiano <dccitaliano@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxx>
>
> Hi Chris, this has been around for a while and it's been reviewed by
> multiple people. Any chances you can pull in your branch?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Davide

Any chance to get this in?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux