Re: Expected behavior of bad sectors on one drive in a RAID1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/20/2015 15:59 -0400, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
>>      .........
>>	With a 32-bit checksum and a 4k block (the math is easier with
>>	smaller numbers), that's 4128 bits, which means that a random
>>	single bit error will have a approximately 0.24% chance of
>>	occurring in a given bit, which translates to an approximately
>>	7.75% chance that it will occur in one of the checksum bits.  For a
>>	16k block it's smaller of course (around 1.8% I think, but that's
>>	just a guess), but it's still sufficiently statistically likely
>>	that it should be considered.
>>      .........



Last I checked, a 4 kilo-BYTE block consisted of 32768 BITs... So the
percentages should in fact be considerably smaller than that.


-- 
twalberg@xxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux