Re: BTRFS raid 5/6 status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



audio muze <audiomuze@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> It seems to me that the simplest option at present is probably to use
> each disk separately, formatted btrfs, and backed up to other drives.
> The data to be stored on these drives is largely static - video and
> audio library.

In that case this might be applicaple to your use case:

  http://www.snapraid.it/

It's a tool to generate (and recover files based on) redundancy data
from n filesystems to m filesystems.

I haven't personally tried it, though, but it sounds like it could fit
that particular use case extraordinarily well, limiting data loss even
in the most extreme situations only to the devices actually lost.

Maybe someone can then use unionfs on top of that.. :)

-- 
  _____________________________________________________________________
     / __// /__ ____  __               http://www.modeemi.fi/~flux/\   \
    / /_ / // // /\ \/ /                                            \  /
   /_/  /_/ \___/ /_/\_\@modeemi.fi                                  \/

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux